Saturday, 25 August 2018

Strength And Conditioning For The Regular Person - How Much Is Enough? How Much Is Too Much?


                

                Earlier this summer my friend and fellow PT and strength training junkie Scotty Butcher tagged me in a brilliant presentation for Ignite Physio where he discussed the value of strength training post rehabilitation to transition from PPLOF (piss poor level of function) to OLOF (optimal level of function).
                As someone who’s a physio, strength coach and powerlifter and has seen, worked with, and/or learned from people who have squatted over a grand to people who can barely out of their own chair it got me thinking. For the regular person who’s not a competitive athlete and just wants to look good, feel good, and be healthy … how much strength is enough? How much cardiovascular fitness is enough? At what point does trying to improve those areas become detrimental to health and cross-over into high performance athletics? That is the topic of today’s article.

Disclaimer: Since many studies on strength use grip strength as a primary measure (which is linked to mortality) I will discuss this topic from a philosophical and opinion based perspective than with specific data as most people, outside of a physio clinic or performance centre, can’t measure their grip strength on a whim. Same goes for cardiovascular fitness.

I’m going to look at this topic from two perspectives

Perspective #1: We should just let people do the activities they want and live their life that way

There’s a lot to be said for this especially given the rates of obesity and inactivity in the developed world. A common saying is “the best form of activity is the one you’ll do and stick to.”

From a compliance perspective – yes it’s important that people enjoy the activities that they are doing. Not everyone enjoys running or slugging weights around as much as you do. It is what it is. As much as people like to knock CrossFit – it’s helped excite a bunch of people to get physically active.

My only concerns with this perspective are two fold

Concern 1 – In some regions, especially here in Canada where it seems to be either cold and snowy or stinking hot all year, many activities that people enjoy (i.e. certain sports, walking, gardening) just don’t get done. What good is an activity if you’re not doing it most of the year?


 Concern 2 – Are these activities enough to build both strength, cardiovascular fitness, lean body mass, and bone density to a point that
-          People can take part in more strenuous activities without any major issues
-          These attributes are built enough and maintained enough to the point where they won’t sink to a harmful level with age and
-          Supply a reserve of ability for after the activity is done

Explaining these points in more detail, and again using Canadian examples, look at the person who just walks and does things around the house … and then has a heartattack during the first major snowfall of the winter while shovelling snow. Those activities that the person took part in did not prepare them enough for the demands of a more physically demanding (yet essential) task nor did it give them a reserve of ability for afterwards as it was a beyond “max effort” task.

In addition – some research have questioned where low intensity activities such as walking can provide enough of a stimulus to maintain health, especially through the aging process.

As such, while it’s important that people pick activities they enjoy, there needs to be enough of a stimulus to promote health and to enable more strenuous essential activities to be done while still maintaining a reserve of physical functioning afterwards.

Perspective #2: We should turn all our physical therapy or personal training clients into powerlifters, endurance athletes or functional fitness freaks

As my friend Nick Tumminello said (paraphrased) we do tend to train our clients based on our specific biases – whether it’s cardio, bodybuilding, powerlifting, kettlebells, crossfit or the like.

While all of these activities, when programmed properly, can have great benefits on physical function my concerns are twofold.

First of all … these activities carry a higher health risk than just training for general health.


 My friend Stan Efferding has said “if you want to be healthy don’t compete.” While strength sports such as bodybuilding, powerlifting, strongman, and crossfit do have an injury rate comparable to (or slightly less than) those of non-contact sports an injury rate ranging from 1 every 10 years to over 1 per year is a lot for someone who’s not pursuing highly competitive athletics. In addition there are the other health risks involved from carrying  too much bodyweight; which includes too much fat and too much muscle; which include OA, insulin sensitivity, high blood pressure, and sleep apnea.

Endurance sports, while widely considered to be healthier than strength sports, actually have a much higher rate of injury. In a recent paper recreational runners are less likely to develop knee OA than the sedentary population – however competitive runners are more likely to develop knee OA. In addition – the relationship between cardiovascular fitness and health is not 100% linear. High performance endurance athletes can have higher mortality and adaptations of the heart that can predispose them to further issues.


 Secondly … training like a high-level athlete can become very burdensome from a time, effort and money perspective. Many high-level athletes train, eat, sleep and recover like it’s their job. Eating 6 meals a day, being in bed by 10 every night, and training 8-10+ hours a week doesn’t seem like the lifestyle most people want to live when their goal is just to be healthy.

As such – training like a competitive athlete isn’t the answer either.

Well what is the answer?

It’s tough to give specifics without understanding a person’s goals, general health, and demands of their life.

A good general guideline for what I consider to be “sufficient” strength and cardiovascular fitness is for people to ….

1)      Be able to do physically demanding activities such as factory and farm work, help move furniture, and be able to play some sports with coworkers/kids … without these tasks being a “max effort” or causing such fatigue or muscle soreness that they can’t be performed consistently.
2)      Have appropriate levels of bone density and lean body mass

…all throughout the lifespan. Some may argue with me – but that’s my standard.

For most people who are healthy and already eat & train well – 2-3 days a week of some well designed strength training & a bit of HIIT training – as well as some leisure walks or bike rides a week should have the desired effect without being burdensome or counterproductive to health.


I hope this article provided some useful food for thought on making the distinction between optimal health and optimal athletic performance. As always – thanks for reading.

Saturday, 28 July 2018

The Biggest Step I Had To Take To Be A Rehab & Fitness Educator




First of all – I want to say thank you to everyone who has supported my site over its first year of existence. I really appreciate all the feedback, likes, shares and other benefits you have given me. Thank you.


I sometimes get asked how I’ve gotten into the role that I have – writing for two sites, having contributed to two books and having contributed to multiple university courses. Also, given the amount of outdated & questionable material out there in health & fitness, I’m sometimes asked how I stay sane and keep a level, positive attitude. This article, which I feel is an appropriate “1 year anniversary” article, delves into that….

Back in 2013, as I was preparing for physio school application interviews, Stu McGill was gracious enough to take some time out of his insane schedule to let me work with him. When I asked him about some of the schools he told me that some of them do teach a lot of outdated materials.

Alo and behold - during my first term of PT school I was getting taught, what I knew was outdated, information and was angry, bitter, frustrated, and depressed about it. Sometimes I felt like I took my anger out on my fellow classmates which, along with my lack of taking care of my physical and mental health, sits as my biggest regret from PT school. This is why I’ve always appreciated when someone sends me a message or posts a comment complimenting me for having a positive, balanced attitude as I wasn’t always that way and have tried to work in that direction. Due to these issues I almost quit PT school more than once along the way and have known many people who have struggled through similar journies.

Side note: so many people comment on my successes but they don’t see the hardships, failures, or low points along the way. Such is true with a lot of people’s stories on social media.

Those frustrations, to be honest, were the biggest spark for me to want to make change in the educational system for both rehab & fitness professionals.

In 2014, during a casual phone call, my old professor and great friend Lora Giangregorio asked me if I would help her design a course on exercise for people with chronic health conditions for the University of Waterloo KInesiology program - to which I said hell yes. I’ve been involved with UW ever since.

In 2014/15 I got asked by Brian Carroll, James Cerbie, and Alexander Cortes to write for PowerRack Strength, Rebel Performance, and EliteFTS respectively. For a 24 year old, still in grad school, the opportunity to write for those high level sites was nothing short of amazing.

Fast forward a couple years – I got asked to be part of a review panel for Western University, contributed to two books, started my own website, and am currently a writer for Mash Elite Performance.

Even though I’ve had the opportunity to reach people from Alaska to Australia … I felt something was missing in my work and my attitude up until a few months ago. The event that tipped that off was the passing of my former physio school instructor Deb Lucy. Deb was one of the main masterminds behind the way the Western University physiotherapy program runs today. She always had a lot of energy and cared a lot about her students. When you’re in the same classes Monday-Friday with the same 50 or so people for months on end … you become a family.


 That made me realize – it was time for me to let go of the anger and bitterness that I harboured towards the education system. It wasn’t helping me and, if anything, it was bringing me down and negatively affecting my relationships with colleagues.

I’m not saying that every piece of material out there in rehab or fitness is peachy or perfect. Far from it. What I do believe though is this - "If you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change" to quote Wayne Dyerr.

When I first learned about pain science & the biopsychosocial model in 2014, near the end of first year physio school, it really shook me and made me question a lot of things I thought I knew. It created some cognitive dissonance and it took me a while to rewire my thought pattern.

That, and the desire to be diplomatic in order to get my knowledge across, are the two main reasons I try to be patient with other professionals who I educate & deal with. I operate under the premise that most professionals mean well and want to help patients – and that belief change is tough especially when you’ve emotionally invested yourself into your methods & the results you get with your clients.

As such – my attitude has shifted. We still have a long way to go and a lot of work to do in improving rehab & fitness education for professionals & students. But I look at the positives – we have a lot of great rehab & fitness professionals who care a lot and want to learn and get better and we have great opportunities and educational methods through schooling, courses, and social media to get the information out there. We can’t change the world – but we can make a little part of the world, a little bit better.

Thank you for your support for the past year, and as always, thanks for reading.

Sunday, 22 July 2018

What I'm Doing Differently In My Third Year Out Of Physiotherapy School - Part 1




           
On a rainy summer day by Elborn College - the building where I spent the bulk of my two years in physiotherapy school.

August 28, 2018 marks the 3rd anniversary of my last day of physiotherapy school. This time last year I wrote a series where I discussed several changes I’ve made in my own practice. In this article I will share some of the things I’ve been doing differently since that time period.

1) Doing more neck strengthening instead of stretching

The traditional, stereotypical PT approach to neck pain rehab consists of a lot of stretching, soft tissue work, and needling of the upper traps, levator scapulae, scalenes and/or SCM muscles. For whatever reason, and maybe it’s just me, this approach never worked well for me or my clients with neck pain and just left a lot of people feeling sore.

By contrast – I’ve gotten much more out of isometric neck exercises (sets of 7-10 second holds within a tolerable level of force) and dynamic shoulder strengthening exercises such as front/side/rear raises, rows, shrugs and shoulder presses (based on the patient’s activity tolerance and physical capabilities). This approach is (in my opinion) better tolerated by my clients.

Side note: this isn’t to say I don’t do any stretching or soft tissue work in people with neck pain as I do see an anecdotal benefit in certain populations (ie radiculopathies) but many people I work with tend to  not enjoy being stretched and are limited more by pain before their neck movements even encounter resistance.


 Image courtesy Focus Fitness

2) Doing less more often in people with persistent pain

Working with persistent pain can be a challenge in terms of exercise prescription as it may be entirely possible that every movement/activity hurts and they can be easy to flare up. It leaves us in a bit of a conundrum as we want to be able to improve/maintain our clients mobility & fitness but we also don’t want to flare them up.

A solution I found came from a podcast I listened to with Greg Lehman last year where he suggested “doing less more often” with people with fibromyalgia and other chronic pain conditions. For example – I would prescribe a set of 3-10 of 1-2 exercises (depending on the client’s goals, limitations, level of irritability, and whether they are having a “good” or “bad” day) to be done repeatedly through the day.

I found this approach helped my clients immensely with maintaining (or even improving) mobility & fitness while minimizing the chances of flaring up.

3) Referring out (or at least backing off) if I’m not the right person to treat someone’s pain

This may seem like common sense physio. If someone has
-          Red Flags: ie tumor, infection, cauda equina syndrome and/or
-          Major orthopedic issues requiring surgery: ie fracture; dislocation; progressive neurological deficit; ligament/meniscus tear creating locking, instability, and/or giving out;
…. Then you need to refer out

I’m not talking about those in particular. I’m talking about cases where, quite frankly, physio just may not be the most valuable use of a client’s time and resources even in the absence of the above issues.

I’ve seen a fair amount of clients this past year with significant levels of pain and disability that were linked to significant psychosocial factors such as job stresses or even deaths/family illnesses. These clients would even tell me that as their stressors went up, so did their pain. After a couple of these cases I realized that, while physio can still have a benefit for maintaining/improving mobility & physical function, that the drivers of their pain were likely beyond my skillset and required counselling or psychotherapy to deal with these issues.

Over the past year I’ve also had patients referred to me for conditions that were clearly medical in nature – such as polymyalgia rheumatica. Again, while we can help with mobility in function, most of the treatment for conditions like PMR is medical in nature.

I’ve ranted before about how I don’t like personal trainers & strength coaches trying to be half-assed PTs but at the same time I don’t believe a rehab professional should try to be a half-ass psychiatrist or doctor. That’s where we need to realize our limitations and refer out to other professionals.

Side note: this isn’t to say that I completely stopped treating them – but we both came to a consensus that other resources were needed.

4) Bubble diagrams for pain science

Quite often I find patients want to know “what causes this?” That’s a great gateway to get into some pain science education. But instead of bombarding people with a bunch of neuroscience – I take the time to do a bubble diagram (similar to Peter O’Sullivan) to show all the different factors that can be involved with a patient’s pain including (where applicable)…
-          Tissue changes
-          Too much (or too little) activity
-          General health factors (i.e. body weight, smoking, poor sleep)
-          Psychosocial factors and maladaptive behaviours

This is a great way to get some practical, applicable information about pain out to the patient without bombarding them with info.


5) Giving patients exercise set/rep ranges

This follows in from Point #3 – I like the idea of giving patients set/rep ranges for exercises so they can adjust if they’re having a good day or bad day. I find this useful for people with persistent pain (or any fluctuating pain) and/or for “borderline” cases where you’re not 100% confident about how far you can push them.

That’s the end of Part 1 of this article. Tune back in a few weeks where I discuss four more changes I’ve made.

Monday, 25 June 2018

Enough Is Enough - Finding Common Ground In Manual Therapy


            
(Yes I did have one with swearing in it but decided to replace it)

              Anyone who knows me knows that I’m not a big fan of participating in online debates. While they can be useful if performed respectively (for instance one between Alan Aragon and Paul Carter from a few years back) – quite often they tend to turn into heated arguments where both sides have hard headed, dogmatic views and have to be right.
This is no more apparent in rehab than in the controversial, hotly debated topic of manual therapy. Some think that manual therapy is the “end all be all” of orthopedics whereas others claim its useless and creates dependency. Once again these debates have sparked up again and have prompted me to come out of my shell and say “enough is enough.” The purpose of this article is to find some common ground between the two ends of the spectrum.

Side note: as with some of my other articles this is not going to be a lit review just for the sake of keeping it easy to read.

Side note two: you can read the preceeding editorials by my lovely, former instructor & colleague Laura Ritchie; by Greg Lehman; and by Adam Meakins by clicking the hyperlinks in their names.

Is manual therapy a high skill technique? No.

As I’ve written about in my article “Simplifying The Manual Therapy Process” – many believe (and teach) the idea that manual therapy is a high skill technique that requires thousands of hours (and dollars) in training. Hell – in physio school we sometimes covered the same technique five times. It gets to the point where new therapists aren’t confident at all in their manual therapy skills in comparison to their bosses, mentors or instructors.

As I said in last year’s article
-          Motion & positional palpation techniques are not reliable
-          You can’t isolate manual therapy to one joint
-          Different techniques have shown the same effectiveness for the same condition
-          Manual therapy’s mechanisms are neurological in nature

Is there “no skill” required to do manual therapy? No. You have to provide enough force & contact to make it feel worthwhile and you have to emphasize the principles that I will discuss near the end of this article.

Is manual therapy the most effective treatment for musculoskeletal issues? No.

This area is more up for debate as studies have shown manual therapy has results ranging from placebo to even better than certain types of exercise. You can pick any PubMed study to support your stance so I’m not going to spend a lot of time on this other than to show that, looking at the evidence as a whole, manual therapy falls behind exercise & psychosocial therapies in the “hierarchy” of effective treatments.

Does that mean we should be 100% hands off? Hell no.

Some may argue with this but I do believe manual therapy has its place in certain situations such as

1) Highly irritable patients

This time of year (late spring/early summer) is when I quite often see patients in irritable situations – quite often due to doing too much too soon with gardening, sports, backyard/cottage parties, or other activities. Sometimes patients just do too much; or have an accident; and are pretty sore, inflamed, and sensitized to the point where they can’t tolerate much of any exercise. And at the end of the day there’s only so much education you can hit someone with & expect them to retain. That’s where manual therapy comes in.

Some would argue “I’d rather have a patient’s appointment cut short than do passive treatment” but if you’re in a clinic where everyone gets 20-30 minute appointment times, and you only give them 5-10 minutes of exercise & education, good luck hanging onto them.

2) Patients with medical contraindications to exercise

Occasionally, in orthopedic practice, you will get patients who have contraindications to exercise due to recent surgery … or cardiovascular or other medical conditions. Again manual therapy, and even (gasp) modalities, can have a time & place in these situations.

3) Highly deconditioned patients

Similar theme as above – we’ve all had those patients that do a few minutes on a recumbent bike or do a couple sets of a very remedial exercise … and are “toast.”

4) Building therapeutic alliance

I only do this occasionally – but I’d rather do a few minutes of manual therapy (or any passive therapy that isn’t contraindicated) to get a hard headed patient on my side & get them doing what I want – then see them go to another therapist who may provide them with a lot of negative language.


 Where do we go from here?

As someone who’s been formerly involved with the physiotherapy education system we need a paradigm shift. Instead of emphasizing pseudobiomechanical faults (that often can’t be reliably assessed and/or don’t correlate with pain), nocebo-ic language, and passive therapies we need a shift towards
-          Teaching professionals to be more effective communicators & build therapeutic alliances with their patients
-          Getting patients to believe in & trust in their bodies and their adaptability
-          Teaching manual therapy in a way that is in line with the evidence
-          Educating patients that pain is more than just tissue damage
-          Emphasizing an interactor vs an operator model (to quote Jason Silvernail)
-          Shifting from emphasizing predominantly passive therapies in practice (and having them on this high pedestal) to using them as an adjunct combined with exercise/movement therapies & education
-          Putting patients in the drivers seat to improve their quality of life
-          And teaching therapists to be competent and confident in all of these areas

This takes a lot of work in the physiotherapy (and rehab) education system, in knowledge transition, and in practice. This is a big challenge for us to take up – but is a must for us to improve the quality of patient care.

I hope this helps find some common ground because that’s my article – and as always thanks for reading.


How Louie Simmons Influenced My Approach To Training & Rehab (for Mash Elite Performance)

Over the last few weeks I have begun to put out content for strength coach & world champion powerlifter Travis Mash. I plan to keep the rehab-based content on this site and put my strength training content on his site (although I will have links to everything here).

In my first article I discuss how Louie Simmons, the coach & owner of Westside Barbell, has influenced my approach to training & rehabilitation.

You can check it out at the link below

https://www.mashelite.com/how-louie-simmons-influenced-my-approach-to-training-and-rehab-by-eric-bowman/

Monday, 11 June 2018

Advice I Would Give A New Physiotherapist Or Physiotherapy Student



              
            Before we get started I am going to be writing for Travis Mash’s website in addition to continuing to post content here. My content for Travis’s website will be more strength training focused whereas this site will be more rehab focused.

One of my favourite podcasts is Karen Litzy’s Healthy, Wealthy, Smart podcast. At the end of each episode she asks her guests “what would you tell your younger self” (or something of a similar nature). It made me think –  almost three years out of PT school – what would I tell my younger self.
                With that in mind, in no particular order, here are some things that I wish I would have known in PT school and when I started….

1) You probably know enough in your exercise & manual therapy knowledge to help a lot of your patients no problem. So be confident when assessing them and interacting with them.

Which brings me to….

2) There are a lot of things you should learn that aren’t taught in school so take the time to do continuing education and take the time to critically reflect on your practice & what needs to be improved.

3) Learn a system of rehabilitation such as Maitland, McKenzie, Mulligan, McGill (why do these all start with M?). You don’t need to be a strict Maitland, McKenzie etc therapist but I believe in the importance of having a base system to work with and to consolidate the info you know. I see too many therapists that are overwhelmed with information, have a hard time consolidating it, and end up throwing crap against the wall to see what sticks.


 4) Understand that you’re never going to be able to cure everyone. Sometimes patients won’t do their exercises or sometimes can’t modify exacerbating activities. Sometimes the patient needs surgery or medical management. Sometimes there are other health issues or psychosocial factors. Sometimes it’s a chronic issue that may not get that much better. Sometimes it’s not the right match of patient & therapist and sometimes, no matter how evidence-based it is, it’s just not the right input to reduce threat.

5) In physio school they teach that every exercise should be painfree. I believe you should do the best you can to make exercises painfree but in some situations (e.g. chronic pain, post-surgical) that may not always be possible. In those cases you need to educate patients that hurt doesn’t always equal and to do exercises in a way that may slightly increase symptoms but achieves their goals and doesn’t worsen them in the long term

Which brings me to….

6) One trick I learned from listening to Greg Lehman is to do “less more often” when working with people with signs of a central sensitization/more widespread pain. I anecdotally find 1-2 low dose exercises done frequently through the day more advantageous than the traditional 3x10 or 3x15 for helping these clients achieve their goals without as high of a risk of flareup.

7) Following on the heels on #5 – pain science education is great but it does need to be tailored to the individual in terms of
- Whether you do it or not and
- How much information you provide

Some will want to know all the details and some patients will be put off by it. A fellow therapist said it best – ask the patient if they want to learn more about pain. If not, no harm no foul.

8) One mistake that I made was subconsciously being in a hurry with my assessments. It’s tough to do this after being put through rigorous, time crunched exams but its important to really slow down your assessment in order to build better rapport with your patients. You may very well be the first one person in the healthcare system that’s actually listened to them.

Also – many objective physiotherapy assessments lack reliability, validity, sensitivity and/or specificity. Towards that end you can really hack down your objective assessment to what’s essential.

9) Take the time to learn how to progress, regress, coach and modify exercises. I learned most of what I know about exercise coaching, cueing, progressions & regressions from strength & conditioning coaches.


 10) When it comes to managing athletic/training injuries I believe workload management is the most important thing. Tim Gabbett’s research has shown that the “sweet spot” for increasing workload lies at about 10-25% at a time. I tend to stick to the “10% rule” of increasing workload in a week as a start and then go from there.

11) Understand that a patient’s recovery (or lack thereof) from pain or disease can be influenced by a multitude of factors including non-specific effects (I hate the word placebo), natural recovery, and other factors in addition to the treatments provided.

The last two points will be familiar if you’ve read my work….

12) Probably the most important point: use positive words with your coaching, cueing & communication. If you tell your client they got 20 things wrong with them, need you to fix them, and will hurt themselves with everything than that may set them up for chronic issues.

Sometimes yes – if you have a client that’s repeatedly doing activities that worsen the issue (despite advice to modify those activities) than you may have to come down heavy – but that should be a last resort. Read on the magnitude of the nocebo effect and the impact of clinician words.

13) If you’re reading this site you probably value continuing education and improving yourself (and others) as a therapist. My big advice – take it slow and don’t rush it. I poured myself into long weeks during and after school with writing, curriculum work, and other side ventures … and burned myself out more than once. Understand that you’re only as good as what you can recover from. Know that line and stick with it.

If you’re a new therapist or a student I hope this provides you with some useful tips. As always – thanks for reading.

Monday, 28 May 2018

How I Assess And Treat People With Low Back Pain Part 2: Treatment


In Part 1 of this series I discussed how I assess people with Low Back Pain (LBP). In this article I get down to the treatment side of things. I want to thank everyone who took the time to read the article & provide such useful feedback. Hence this article is out later than desired as I wanted to reformat it & do it right.

Disclaimers: As I said in Part 1 this is not intended to be medical advice. Plus I don’t expect that everyone’s going to agree with every single point that I make – that’s fine. Also this is going to be a long article and is very context and assessment dependent. It’s not a recipe.

My approach comes down to 4 basic tenets

1) Minimize what exacerbates the issue

I didn’t say “take away” or “remove” as for some people, such as patients with chronic pain and central sensitization, that may not be realistically doable. But I still believe in modifying and reducing (and if possible eliminating) what exacerbates the issue. These can be
-          Specific movements, postures, loads, behaviours, activities (or volumes of activities) or repeated movements OR
-          General health factors such as poor sleep, stress, depression, or being overweight

Going step by step through these…

Movement/Posture: My movement recommendations depend a lot on the mechanism.

If someone is aggravated by very specific directions or postures (i.e. what some would consider flexion intolerant or extension intolerant) than yes I get people to move in a way that’s not provocative (or is at least less provocative). This may involve using a neutral spine/hip hinge technique (I teach a modified sumo lift technique for people with sciatica and for tall people), emphasis on using the gluteal muscles more (they are never turned off short of a neurological injury) and bracing … or conversely relaxing the core musculature and breathing deeply as some patients are very tense & guarded and need to relax.


 For posture – oddly enough (and there’s a bit of research and anecdotal support on this) that some people tend to sit or stand in the same posture that provokes their symptoms and some are very rigid & overprotective!!! For these people I will have them adjust their lordotic curve to find a position that’s comfortable for them. I’m more of a fan of teaching people how to find movements & postures that are comfortable for them rather than trying to find an ideal.

One of the reasons why I look at movements and repeated movements is to give people ways to do their day to day tasks that (hopefully) don’t aggravate their symptoms. While I’m not a fan of telling people to avoid movements forever it doesn’t make sense to force people through movements that can aggravate and worsen their symptoms with repetition. Sometimes you need to take a break from the exacerbating issues to facilitate recovery. How long movements are avoided is a contentious topic that depends on a variety of different factors.

For people who have more of a central sensitization (CS) pattern it may be that everything (including hip hinging) hurts to some degree. In these populations I’m not as concerned about movement technique as I am about other variables (more on that below) but I will still teach some biomechanical principles (i.e. keeping loads to the body, avoiding excessive muscle tensing or bracing) to make things easier in theory.

General health: In terms of other risk factors and contributors to LBP
-          Sleep: I educate patients on simple sleep hygiene (which I will write about in another article) and on the importance of sleep. Past that if there are other issues I will refer to sleep specialists especially if I have bigger clientele who may have sleep apnea or people who may have major psychosocial issues.
-          Stress, Anxiety, Depression and other psychosocial factors: I’m gonna get some heat for saying this but I don’t believe; unless it’s related to movement, injury, pain or activity; that physios should be trying to treat psychosocial factors other than educating patients about their importance, giving them some exercise to do (which can help with psychosocial factors) and again referring out.
-          Body weight management: Same principles apply – educate the patient about the importance of it, get them moving, and if need be refer out to other health professionals who can help fill in the blanks with diet and hormone management.

The 2nd key principle of my approach to back pain is that

2) Well tolerated movement & exercise are good

A lot of research has shown that general exercise and “core stability” exercises are equally effective for LBP management. While I don’t disagree with the research I’ve found (anecdotally) that some people with LBP may not tolerate certain exercises well – be it core training, walking, cycling, general strength training, or directional exercises.

For home exercises my first go to are generally repeated movement/McKenzie style assessments based on the directional preference of the person I’m working with. If a client I’m working with doesn’t have a directional preference my home exercises are generally
-          For more nociceptive/neuropathic cases: usually exercises that address “painless dysfunctions” (I hate the term but that’s what people understand) that may limit an individual’s ability to move in non-painful (or less painful) patterns such a lack of hip, ankle or shoulder mobility and/or a lack of hip/core strength or endurance
-          For people with more of a CS presentation: some people I work with who have CS are insanely deconditioned and have some MAJOR mobility or strength limitations. In those situations I give people 1-2 low dose exercises (ie sets of 2-5 2-4x/day working into a bit of pain but not blowing through it) to either address these limitations or maintain the mobility that’s already there

In the clinic I am also a fan of core, glute, and general cardiovascular exercise for most people with LBP who tolerate them. Some may criticize me – but given the poor adherence of patients to home exercise programs I’d rather see them do a few exercises in the clinic rather than f*cking around with a TENS machine or ultrasound. For people who tend to have more of a CS presentation I spend more time talking and a lot less time with exercise & manual therapy.


3) Address negative beliefs about movement, the body, pain and activity

As I said above I’m not a fan of physios trying to be psychiatrists. Just as you wouldn’t want a personal trainer trying to treat a client’s broken arm … I don’t believe a physio should be trying to treat a client’s PTSD from combat or trying to grief counsel a mother who’s lost her kid.

But anything related to movement, activity, pain, injury or the body is within our ballpark IMO.

Therapists such as Peter O’Sullivan have written about the importance of beliefs as they relate to LBP. While pain science education is important sometimes patient education has to take different paths based on the individual.

In my experience some people respond quite well to pain science education and others have a hard time changing their view of pain. Behaviour change and belief change is a long, time consuming process for some people and some may never change their beliefs. We as a society have become so engrained in the idea that pain is always due to “issues in the tissues” that some patients may never change their beliefs. We as therapists have to accept that we can’t change everyone.

In more “non-specific” cases I point out how a patient’s pain is due to changes in their nervous system and body that make them more sensitive and more likely to experience pain. This allows me to put a “feeler” out there to determine if the patient is interested in more pain science education. If they are – great. If not, no harm no foul.  If they want to learn more than I will draw a bubble diagram outlining all the factors contributing to the situation and will go into more detail about pain science in coming appointments.

In patients where there is a legit tissue injury, or in cases where a patient is dead-set that their MRI findings are the cause of the problem, I point out how a lot of back injuries can heal given proper management.

A big component of my work is positive coaching and cueing. Some health and fitness professionals freak patients out by pointing out numerous dysfunctions that either can’t be reliably assessed and/or don’t correlate well with pain. I don’t coach certain people to do certain movements or exercises by saying “do this or your back will explode.” I coach movement and positional strategies in a way that empowers patients to move in ways that are comfortable for them. Sometimes showing people ways to move and exercise that are comfortable for them alleviates a lot of the anxiety and enables people to trust in their bodies a lot more.

I also believe that getting people to do things they never thought they could do (within reason of course) and progressively working them towards the activities they want to do also helps build confidence & change beliefs.

4) Build people back to the activities that they want to do

This is where we tackle the first elephant in the room … spinal flexion


 Yes – most of my patients that I see on Day 1 (arguably over 97%) don’t tolerate much spinal flexion. As such I try to minimize that in the early stages. However, while I’m still reluctant to have people flex 100 million times a day or to do it under heavy load, I do believe we should be able to move our spines as needed.

When patients are getting closer to full recovery I start to ease them back into spinal movements through low-load exercises such as cat camels & prayer stretches and progress them to being able to move fully in standing. There are however situations where I will stick to the “minimize spinal movement” approach such as….
-          People with a recurrent flexion or extension or motion intolerant low back pain that is more nociceptive and/or neuropathic in nature
-          People with moderate to severe osteoporosis who are at higher risk of fracture
-          Athletes who require a great degree of spinal stiffness in their sports such as powerlifters

In these three populations I often encourage people to hip hinge as much as possible. I don’t say “don’t bend your back or your spine will blow out” but I do believe that hip hinging is a better option to achieve their goals.

If a certain exercise or activity is a goal of the individual (e.g. returning to walking) than the activity itself (or some close derivative) is part of the exercise program and is progressed based on the individual’s activity tolerance in increments of 5-20% per week based on how the patient responds. As Tim Gabbett has said (yes his research is in athletes but I believe it applies here too) people respond differently to different increases in activity and as such you have to be flexible to adjust the rate of progression to your clients tolerance.

For people with nociceptive or neuropathic pain I prefer having people do activities in shorter bursts, stopping just before their pain would increase, and repeating those bursts through the day. I find anecdotally that many of my patients who use this technique for walking or activities experience a huge increase in their pain free walking tolerance within a couple weeks.

For people who have more CS with walking (or any activity) I just advise that it’s OK to work into a little bit of pain, not to blow aggressively blow through pain, and work with them to slowly increase the amount that’s done.


 What about the other elephant in the room – manual therapy?

I’ll confess that I use manual therapy less than most therapists do. If it’s a patient that’s had chronic back pain for years and has already sought out a bunch of passive treatment modalities than manual therapy isn’t going to be the first thing that I’ll do with them. In addition I find manual therapy, no matter how gently its done, just makes some people really sore.

By the same token if I have a case that’s so irritable that they can barely tolerate any activity, someone who’s overdone it, or someone who is limited in ability to exercise due to deconditioning or medical comorbidities, than manual therapy (or even modalities) can play a role but in my opinion it’s not as important for overall treatment as many therapists think.

When doing manual therapy for the back (or for other joints) I try to direct it towards painless limitations (I hate the word dysfunctions) first and then afterwards painful areas. Since manual therapy’s effects are non-specific, if I can reduce pain and improve function in another of the body that kills 2 birds with 1 stone.


So that is basically how I go about treating people with LBP. As always, thanks for reading.

State of the Profession Address: Psychologically Informed Physiotherapy - Evolutions, Growth, Concerns and Next Steps

Disclaimers 1. This post may be controversial and ruffle some feathers 2. It is important to remember the different scopes of physio practic...