A new study on the McKenzie
method (or MDT) (http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2017/07/12/bjsports-2016-097327)
has been making waves across the rehab
world as it showed that the McKenzie method was superior to placebo for pain
but not disability in people with chronic low back pain (LBP).
Its
important that we have these discussions and perspectives about popular rehab
methods. That said – before I join the “anti-MDT” bandwagon I want to provide
some alternative food for thought.
There is a fair amount of
research that supports the McKenzie method for LBP management although in LBP
(and in other conditions) it does seem that those with a directional preference
tend to benefit more from their exercises whereas those without tend to fair
equally with MDT as they do with any other exercise.
Side note: A good chunk of the research (at least that
I’ve read) supporting MDT has been done by people who use MDT and/or teach it
so there is the potential for bias in the research.
This site has a comprehensive list of all MDT related
research http://www.mckenzieinstitute.org/clinicians/research-and-resources/reference-list/
People
who know me know I’m a big proponent of the McKenzie method as well as Dr.
Stuart McGill’s principles as they enable me to guide what movements, exercises
& postures are and aren’t tolerated by the individual. While some people
make claims like “it doesn’t matter what exercise you give someone with back
pain just get them moving” – I’ve had too many patients tell me that their
symptoms were worsened by the exercises they got from a previous PT, chiro etc
to believe that exercise choice doesn’t matter.
Image courtesy https://www.focusfitness.net/stock-photos/wp-content/uploads/edd/2017/06/219-toe-touch-yoga-stretch.jpg
That
being said with all the great research we have on pain science, the
biopsychosocial model, and the complexities of pain … we’d be naïve to think
that we can fix all persistent back pain just by getting people to lie on their
elbows or bend in a particular direction. I believe a more comprehensive
approach is needed which is why I integrate the more mechanically oriented
McGill and McKenzie methods with those of Moseley, Butler, and O’Sullivan.
And
this is the elephant in the room – we don’t a great method of persistent pain
management in PT. This is a challenge that we, as Moseley quoted in a recent
paper, must rise to.
No comments:
Post a Comment